Livejournal use
I don't read LJ every day any more. There's not enough content to justify it.
I'm entirely useless at updating. I've started taking a snapshot or two every day to at least remind me of what the hell I was doing on any given day. But they go up on Google+ because that's the easiest dispatch method. I'd had a vague idea of annotating them but who has the time?
The LJ "community" is all but gone. The new homepage changes show that LJ care nothing for me, they are courting gossip-loving celebrity obsessed people who want to be popular among their peers.
I haven't been to a convention since last year's Eastercon, which I didn't enjoy. I'm signed up for Nine Worlds and Worldcon but not sure how much I'm going to get out of them. Somehow I'm not part of that world any more, and it wasn't entirely intentional.
On Tuesday I went to a talk by Terry Pratchett and Stephen Baxter, expecting to see numerous familiar faces among the audience. I recognised the guys who produce The Museum of Curiosity, and Mitch Benn was pointed out at the end. There was a face I thought might be familiar but I couldn't attach a name to it.
How things change.
If you're on my friends list, though, I am reading your stuff. I sometimes even comment. But engagement with LJ is definitely diminishing.
I'm entirely useless at updating. I've started taking a snapshot or two every day to at least remind me of what the hell I was doing on any given day. But they go up on Google+ because that's the easiest dispatch method. I'd had a vague idea of annotating them but who has the time?
The LJ "community" is all but gone. The new homepage changes show that LJ care nothing for me, they are courting gossip-loving celebrity obsessed people who want to be popular among their peers.
I haven't been to a convention since last year's Eastercon, which I didn't enjoy. I'm signed up for Nine Worlds and Worldcon but not sure how much I'm going to get out of them. Somehow I'm not part of that world any more, and it wasn't entirely intentional.
On Tuesday I went to a talk by Terry Pratchett and Stephen Baxter, expecting to see numerous familiar faces among the audience. I recognised the guys who produce The Museum of Curiosity, and Mitch Benn was pointed out at the end. There was a face I thought might be familiar but I couldn't attach a name to it.
How things change.
If you're on my friends list, though, I am reading your stuff. I sometimes even comment. But engagement with LJ is definitely diminishing.

no subject
no subject
no subject
I don't know of an online community that actually is any better than LJ, currently.
no subject
Nine Worlds looks really good. The breadth of the subject matter should help you find stuff to have a fun time, even if it's a different sort of fun time to the ones you might have had at cons you've been to in the past. I knew the guy who's co-running the LARPs at university (and might have met his wife who's co-running them, though I don't remember her) and think they have an excellent chance of being spectacular in their way. The social gaming probably has a lot in common with Hide and Seek things, as well.
Courage, persistence, good luck and lots of laughs to you!
no subject
no subject
no subject
I also blame iPads. I suspect an awful lot of us have these on our laps and I really find the predictive text dreadful (maybe should just turn itI off!)
no subject
no subject
no subject
But it's still my preferred way of keeping in touch with the people still using it. So I'm glad you post.
no subject
So I'm still here, at least for the nonce.
no subject
no subject
I use FB a lot more, but that's mainly because it's where I post my photos-of-the-days, and because its ephemeral feeling means I don't mind posting ephemeral fluff there. Somewhere in my head is the idea that a post to LJ must have Proper Substance, so I default to rarely writing any. I compose a lot in my head, but they practically never make it as far as a keyboard.
I haven't been to a convention for a few years now.
no subject
no subject
Some folks remain dedicated to Twitter, but I have trouble satisfactorily reconciling the public nature of much of it and how much public stuff there is taht I want to read. Some of the frequent users tweet only privately, but that's not for me.
Facebook would work if only they showed us all of the posts consistently, the way LJ and DW do. I'd even pay for that service!
no subject
Of course, it's debatable if what I have to say on an irregular basis merits my labelling it "interesting" anyway.
Still, LJ is useful for musings about "events", few and far between as they are. And I still check in most days, just in case.
Good to see you here, nonetheless.